Bimonthly

ISSN 1006-9585

CN 11-3693/P

+Advanced Search 中文版
Comparison of Two Reanalysis Data with the RS92 Radiosonde Data
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
    Abstract:

    An intercomparison by interpolation is made between two types of reanalysis data (NCEP/NCAR and ERA-Interim) and seven months (May 2008 to December 2008) measurements of high vertical resolution GPS radiosonde (RS92) at Shouxian station (32.56°N, 116.78°E), China. The correlation coefficient (R), bias (Bias), and mean absolute deviation (Mad)of temperature (T), zonal wind (U), meridional wind (V), and relative humidity (RH) are presented at the standard pressure levels of two reanalysis data sets from 1000 hPa to 20 hPa. The results indicate better correlation of RS92 observations with the ERA-Interim data than that with the NCEP/NCAR data. T, U, and V have higher correlation coefficients than RH at all levels. R of T is close to 1.0 from 1000 hPa to 250 hPa and decreases gradually above 250 hPa. The absolute values of bias for T is mostly less than 0.3 ℃ between ERA-Interim and RS92, but about two times between NCEP and RS92 at all levels. R of U is larger in middle and upper troposphere than in lower troposphere and lower stratosphere. R of V increases with height in the troposphere and decreases dramatically in lower stratosphere. R of RH decreases with height. It is shown that Bias of RH ranges from 10% to 20% through 400 hPa to 100 hPa and becomes smaller than 10% in the upper layers, which is in part attributed to the limitation of measurement precision.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

朱彦良,凌超,陈洪滨,张金强,彭亮,余予.2012.两种再分析资料与RS92探空资料的比较分析[J].气候与环境研究,17(3):381-391. ZHU Yanliang, LING Chao, CHEN Hongbin, ZHANG Jinqiang, PENG Liang, YU Yu.2012. Comparison of Two Reanalysis Data with the RS92 Radiosonde Data[J]. Climatic and Environmental Research (in Chinese],17(3):381-391.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:August 09,2010
  • Revised:November 25,2011
  • Adopted:
  • Online: May 16,2012
  • Published: